* External authors




On the Validity of Arrest as a Proxy for Offense: Race and the Likelihood of Arrest for Violent Crimes

Riccardo Fogliato*

Alice Xiang

Zachary Lipton*

Daniel Nagin*

Alexandra Chouldechova*

* External authors




The risk of re-offense is considered in decision-making at many stages of the criminal justice system, from pre-trial, to sentencing, to parole. To aid decision makers in their assessments, institutions increasingly rely on algorithmic risk assessment instruments (RAIs). These tools assess the likelihood that an individual will be arrested for a new criminal offense within some time window following their release. However, since not all crimes result in arrest, RAIs do not directly assess the risk of re-offense. Furthermore, disparities in the likelihood of arrest can potentially lead to biases in the resulting risk scores. Several recent validations of RAIs have therefore focused on arrests for violent offenses, which are viewed as being more accurate reflections of offending behavior. In this paper, we investigate biases in violent arrest data by analysing racial disparities in the likelihood of arrest for White and Black violent offenders. We focus our study on 2007–2016 incident-level data of violent offenses from 16 US states as recorded in the National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS). Our analysis shows that the magnitude and direction of the racial disparities depend on various characteristics of the crimes. In addition, our investigation reveals large variations in arrest rates across geographical locations and offense types. We discuss the implications of the observed disconnect between re-arrest and reoffense in the context of RAIs and the challenges around the use of data from NIBRS to correct for the sampling bias.

Related Publications

Reconciling Legal and Technical Approaches to Algorithmic Bias

Tennessee Law Review, 2021
Alice Xiang

In recent years, there has been a proliferation of papers in the algorithmic fairness literature proposing various technical definitions of algorithmic bias and methods to mitigate bias. Whether these algorithmic bias mitigation methods would be permissible from a legal pers…

Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty

AIES, 2021
Umang Bhatt*, Javier Antorán*, Yunfeng Zhang*, Q. Vera Liao*, Prasanna Sattigeri*, Riccardo Fogliato*, Gabrielle Melançon*, Ranganath Krishnan*, Jason Stanley*, Omesh Tickoo*, Lama Nachman*, Rumi Chunara*, Madhu*

Algorithmic transparency entails exposing system properties to various stakeholders for purposes that include understanding, improving, and contesting predictions. Until now, most research into algorithmic transparency has predominantly focused on explainability. Explainabil…

"What We Can’t Measure, We Can’t Understand": Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness

FaccT, 2021
McKane Andrus*, Elena Spitzer*, Jeffrey Brown*, Alice Xiang

As calls for fair and unbiased algorithmic systems increase, so too does the number of individuals working on algorithmic fairness in industry. However, these practitioners often do not have access to the demographic data they feel they need to detect bias in practice. Even …

  • HOME
  • Publications
  • On the Validity of Arrest as a Proxy for Offense: Race and the Likelihood of Arrest for Violent Crimes


Shape the Future of AI with Sony AI

We want to hear from those of you who have a strong desire
to shape the future of AI.